My last post was 4 1/2 months ago or so. While I’ve been doing a lot online, much of it has been related to researching the issues related to an casino that will likely be opening in this area, as well as sharing that information on a grassroots Facebook group. We also traveled for several weeks out in some of the western states.
Started in late June, the Facebook group quickly grew to over 6,000 members and is now approaching 7,200 members and, yes, we have had an impact. We thought that, at best, we would be waiting for a local county ordinance mandated vote on the casino in either March 2020, during the primary, or November 2020, during the general election, after which, if approved, a constitutionally required document supporting a casino operator could be written and signed and that casino operator could then apply for a casino license.
Well, it didn’t work out that way. We’re actually further than we anticipated we would be this time next year!
Here we are at the beginning of December 2019, just under a year away from that general election and we have a casino operator, Cherokee Nation Businesses (CNB). that has been provided with multiple support documents from county officials. CNB submitted their application in August, which initiated a new 90 day application period, which ended a couple of weeks ago.
So, we should be just waiting for that license to be issued and for CNB to break ground at the site of the new casino, right?
If only it were that easy.
Earlier in the year, county officials and their attorney tried to find a way to have the ordinance required vote, but kept getting told by state officials and other legal authorities that we couldn’t legally have a vote the way the ordinance required and that the ordinance was trumped by the constitutional amendment. So, after getting a sense through ways other than the ballot — surveys, telephone, polls, social media, e-mail, etc. — that the public wanted a casino, the county quorum court passed a resolution of support, one of the options required by the new casino gaming amendment to the state’s constitution, for CNB on August 13th…. and were promptly served with subpoenas and a lawsuit by a local anti-casino group and a prominent realtor.
That lawsuit has already been heard in circuit court and has been dismissed with prejudice — the issue can’t be filed again, though the case could be appealed — and the ordinance was declared unconstitutional. That was already a moot point, as it had been repealed by the quorum court the night before, though the judge didn’t take that into consideration in his rulings.
At that point, other legal hurdles remained.
Three of the county justices of the peace — essentially elected positions equivalent to county commissioners in other states — faced ethic charges filed in connection to the casino issue. A couple of weeks ago, after hearing from investigators, the four members of the Arkansas Ethics Commission unanimously voted to clear them of the charges.
Last August, the local anti-casino group and the prominent realtor who sued our county officials also sued the Arkansas Racing Commission. (The 2018 constitutional amendment that established casino gaming in Arkansas assigned casino regulation and licensing to the already existing Racing Commission.) That case is based on the same ordinance as the dismissed case in our county. Besides the ordinance being repealed by the county and declared unconstitutional by the circuit court, other support documents from county officials were written and submitted to the Racing Commission. The plaintiff’s case has been rendered totally moot, though it is scheduled for a hearing later this month.
In June, the Racing Commission rejected license applications from five casino applicants because none of them had valid documents of support from county officials. While one of them, Gulfside Casino Partnership, had letters of support, they were from officials that had been out of office several months when Gulfside submitted their application on May 17. State law and Arkansas Casino Gaming Rules require that the support documents come from current local officials. In July, Gulfside submitted an appeal to the Racing Commission on their license rejection and, in August, the Racing Commission denied that appeal. Gulfside subsequently filed for judicial review of the Racing Commission’s ruling. The basis for their appeal and request for judicial review is their assertion that the rules were changed after they received the letters of support and that the state law and gaming rule are unconstitutional. In fact, their claim is largely based on an email from the Commission’s attorney as well as proposed rules that the commission approved for publication and comment, rules that were never actually published and never implemented. This case is currently in quasi-legal limbo over venue, which has changed twice already, with no new hearing date scheduled.
By the gaming rules, it looks like a license should be issued to CNB sometime in the next month or so. However, since the Racing Commission is the body charged with developing, maintaining, and administering the rules, they should be able to waive the rule and delay issuing a license if litigation issues warrant it.
As always, time will tell!
Crystal Blue Persuasion by Tommy James and the Shondells
…
Image from Pixabay1
In a 2006 blog post about new nuclear power plants, I predicted “Almost certainly within the next 10 years, there will be several under construction, possibly one or more on line, providing power to the national electric grid.”
Ten years later, demand for energy was soaring, the price of natural gas had quadrupled — gas powered generating plants provided 24% of U.S. generation — and Congress had approved significant incentives for new nuclear plants. Over half of Americans believed new nuclear power plants should be built. Construction was restarted on plants that had been previously terminated, Watts Bar Unit 2 and Bellefonte Unit 1.
Watts Barr Unit 2, with initial criticality on May 23, 2016, entered commercial operation on October 19, 2016, 43 years after construction began.3, 4 At least 4 nuclear power units were under construction at that time, 2 in South Carolina at the V.C. Summer site and Vogtle Units 3 and 4 in Georgia.
I had been right with that 2006 prediction. A decade later a “new” plant was on line and 4 more were under construction.
However,…
On August 14, 2017, construction was stopped at both new V.C. Summer units, eight years after construction began.5, 6
Beginning in 1992, deregulation dramatically shifted portions of the electricity production industry from a tightly regulated monopoly to a free market system. From 1999, when Entergy bought Pilgrim, through 2007, “48 of the nation’s 103 nuclear power reactors were sold to independent power producers selling power in competitive wholesale markets.”7
Since then, though, conditions that favored investment in new nuclear and movement of existing nuclear into merchant fleets have evaporated, adversely impacting many existing nuclear units and reducing the potential for new nuclear plants.
Natural gas and oil prices had spiked upward in North America from 2000 through 2008 due to a decline in production and an increase in demand for electricity generation.8
The steeply rising natural gas and oil prices of the 2000s – crude exceeded $140 a barrel in 2008 – brought capital investment and extensive development, drilling, and construction into the fossil fuel sector.9 Since 2005, the U.S. has seen more than 100,000 new oil and gas wells.10 With advancements in horizontal drilling and fracking technology, from 2007 to 2016 U.S. natural gas production rose 39% and oil went up 75%.11 As well, the average operating expenses for existing gas turbine power plants has been cut by more than half, while it’s gone up slightly for nuclear.12
Changes in the merchant electrical environment, primarily significantly lower natural gas prices, adversely impacted many companies owning and operating nuclear power plants. About half of the U.S. plants currently in operation are in deregulated regions of the country where consumers can choose their electric provider instead of using the utility-appointed supplier. Dozens of plants in those areas are seeking financial support to stay operating.13
Several plants have been permanently shut down in recent years, most before the end of their existing operating license:14
More plants are expected to follow in permanently shutting down:
Other plant’s are in jeopardy of early closure.
Bankrupt company FirstEnergy Solutions is likely to shutter Davis-Besse (PWR) and Perry (BWR) Nuclear Power Plants in 2020 and 2021 if it doesn’t get subsidies from the state of Ohio. Davis-Besse is currently unable to pay for the next refueling, scheduled in 2020.27 Without financial assistance from Pennsylvania, FirstEnergy Solutions will also shut down Beaver Valley Units 1 & 2 (BWRS) sometime after June 2021.28
Nuclear power’s share of U.S. total utility-scale electricity generation is expected to fall from 20% this year to 19%, mainly due to nuclear plant retirements.29 Despite the loss of seven reactors since 2013, power plant uprates and shorter refueling outages have made it possible to maintain a relatively constant total actual U.S. nuclear generation.30 With only two new reactors on the horizon and six, possibly eight, to close in the next six years, nuclear generation’s share in U.S. production is anticipated to decline for the foreseeable future – as energy consumption continues to rise – reaching 12% by 2050.31
In March 2019, the NRC-issued combined licenses (COL)32 for Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Station Units 2 and 3 were terminated.
Fourteen COLs were issued between February 2012 and April 2018. Six have subsequently been terminated. Of the remaining eight, construction is in progress only on Vogtle Units 3 and 4.33 Applications made for several other COLs were withdrawn. Four – Comanche Peak, Units 3 and 4 and Shearon Harris, Units 2 and 3 – have been suspended.34
In 2011, the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) authorized resumption of construction of Bellefonte Unit 1, but later, in 2015, determined that it would be unlikely to need a new large plant such as Bellefonte for the next 20 years. TVA directors declared the plant surplus in 2016 and put it up for auction, but two years later pulled out of a resulting sales agreement, citing failure of the buyer to obtain regulatory approval for the transfer of the site.35
Construction is billions over budget and years behind schedule for Vogtle Units 3 & 4. In March, the U.S. Department of Energy finalized up to $3.7 billion in loan guarantees for Vogtle, bringing the federal government’s total in loan guarantees for Vogtle to $12 billion.36
It’s harder predict the fate of nuclear power ten years down the road than it was in 2006. The favorable conditions of 2006 have given way to much more difficult financial and energy generation market environments. Since about 2010, the prospect of continuing low natural gas prices has dampened plans for new nuclear capacity.37 With a combination of low wholesale electricity prices and escalating costs, older plants are closing faster than new plants are being built.
Last year, a senior official with Exelon – America’s largest nuclear plant operating company – predicted a dim future for U.S. Nuclear Power. “The fact is – and I don’t want my message to be misconstrued in this part – I don’t think we’re building any more nuclear plants in the United States. I don’t think it’s ever going to happen,” said William Von Hoene, senior vice president and chief strategy officer at Exelon. “I’m not arguing for the construction of new nuclear plants. They are too expensive to construct, relative to the world in which we now live.”38 After Von Hoene’s statements were picked up by many media outlets, Exelon President and Chief Executive Officer Chris Crane said the company was “unequivocally committed to a strong and successful future for nuclear energy, including advancing and investing in new technology, while tirelessly promoting sound energy policies and critically needed market reforms.” However, despite Exelon’s convictions, “it is clear that new, large-scale nuclear plants are not viable in today’s U.S. competitive markets, where even existing nuclear plants are challenged due to the failure of these markets.” With needed reforms, though, Exelon “sees tremendous promise in advanced nuclear technologies, including small modular reactors that can be built on a shorter capital cycle.”39
More than 75 commercial U.S. reactors have had their licenses renewed for an additional 20 years of operation past the original 40 year license.40 Several plants will be nearing the end of that extension in the next decade. A second renewal, called “subsequent license renewal” by the NRC, would extend the operating life of existing reactors 20 more years, out to 80 years after their initial commercial operation date. Once an application is accepted as sufficiently complete, the NRC’s goal is to complete safety and environment reviews within 18 months.41 The NRC currently has subsequent renewal applications for six reactors under review.42
Because of the high capital cost of large power reactors and interest for servicing small electricity grids under 4 GWe outside the U.S, there is interest in developing smaller reactors, such as small modular reactors43 (SMRs). These could be built independently or as modules in a larger facility, with capacity added as needed. Independent units could be constructed for remote sites away from conventional power grids. Smaller units would also be suitable for replacing decommissioned coal plants, over 90% of which are under 500 MWe and some under 50 MWe. Worldwide, “four main options are being pursued, light water reactors, fast neutron reactors, graphite-moderated high temperature reactors and various kinds of molten salt reactors (MSRs).”44
Worldwide, out of over 30 designs for smaller reactors, only a few have gone beyond various design stages:

Floating Nuclear Power Unit, ‘Akademik Lomonosov’ in port of Murmansk, Russia, September 201850
On September 2018, President Trump signed the Nuclear Energy Innovation Capabilities Act (NEICA) which passed Congress with bipartisan support. The bill established “an advanced nuclear energy licensing cost-share grant program between industry and the federal government to accelerate the deployment of small modular reactors and advanced reactor technologies.”53
Another bipartisan bill, the Nuclear Energy Innovation and Modernization Act (NEIMA), became law on January 17, 2019. It requires the NRC to modify the licensing process for commercial advanced reactors facilities, establishes new transparency and accountability measures to the NRC’s budget and fee programs, and caps fees for existing reactors. 54
On March 27, 2019, the bipartisan Nuclear Energy Leadership Act (NELA) was re-submitted, having been considered in the previous US Congress, which ended January 2. “It directs the US Secretary of Energy ‘to establish advanced nuclear goals, provide for a versatile, reactor-based fast neutron source, make available high-assay, low-enriched uranium for research, development, and demonstration of advanced nuclear reactor concepts, and for other purposes.” NELA includes “authorisation of long-term power purchase agreements; the establishment of a long-term nuclear power purchase agreement pilot program; advanced nuclear reactor research and development goals; a nuclear energy strategic plan; a versatile, reactor-based fast neutron source; advanced nuclear fuel security programs; and a university nuclear leadership program.”55
Commercial nuclear power in the United States has, at times, been plagued by circumstances unexpected by the original owners and investors.
The 1979 accident at Three Mile Island resulted in immediate and long term impacts on the U.S. nuclear power industry. The Nuclear Regulatory Commission issued temporary shutdown orders for all Babcock & Wilcox built reactors and delayed issuance of new operating licenses. Additional requirements were placed on all new and existing plants. Numerous reactors, proposed, planned or under construction, were canceled.56 Fifty-three reactors under construction were eventually licensed. One, Shoreham Nuclear Power Plant on Long Island, New York, was licensed by the NRC, but, due to local and state opposition never operated higher than 5% of rated power, closing less than three years after receiving its operating license.
For pressurized water reactors, thinning, corrosion, cracks, leaks and ruptures in steam generator (SG) tubes in the 1970s and 80s often led to more frequent shutdowns for additional SG tube inspections. While SGs were intended to last the original 40-year initial licensing period, most SGs have required replacement after 20 to 30 years, a capital expense of several hundred million dollars. Some PWRs shut down permanently primarily (or partially) because of SG issues.57 Large holes must be cut in the reactor containment to remove old SGs and move the new ones in.
Complications following steam generator replacement have also resulted in permanent shutdown of some PWRs.
In 2009, during an outage for a power uprate and steam generator replacement at Crystal River, a delamination, or crack, occurred in the outer wall of the containment building. Attempts to repair the damage resulted in additional delaminations in 2011. A late 2012 report said the plant could be repaired but forecast that the cost could exceed $3 billion and take eight years.58
Following replacement of San Onofre’s steam generators in both units in 2010 and 2011, Unit 3 was required to shutdown due to an 82 gallon per day SG tube leak. All four replacement SGs were subsequently determined to have vibration related tube wear, later attributed by Southern California Edison to design flaws.59
On March 11, 2011, a magnitude 9.0 earthquake shook Japan for three minutes and triggered a tsunami which killed over 19,000. Because of overwhelming media coverage, what most people outside Japan remember, though, is the Fukushima nuclear accident caused by flooding of the plant site by the tsunami. The accident’s impact on the nuclear industry was severe in many nations. The U.S. saw new regulatory requirements for existing and new plants.
The 31 new reactor applications filed with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission at the height of the nuclear renaissance (2008-09) had dwindled by two-thirds before Fukushima and is now down to two with construction in progress.60
Of the major firms that built America’s nuclear plants – GE, Combustion Engineering, Babcock & Wilcox and Westinghouse – only Westinghouse still markets commercial nuclear reactors . In January 2018, Westinghouse, a subsidiary of Toshiba, was sold to a Canadian firm after filing for bankruptcy in March 2017.61 At the end of July 2017, Santee Cooper, the South Carolina public power utility, decided to halt construction on V. C. Summer 2 & 3, at that point approximately two-thirds complete, due to “significant challenges” “notably uncertain costs, the uncertain availability of production tax credits, and reduced demand forecast.”61
I think it is likely that the Vogtle units will be completed. The NuScale project in Idaho has a good prospect of being constructed. Beyond those listed earlier, it’s likely that one or two reactors will encounter unforeseen circumstances that will result in early shutdown. Many reactor licensees will apply for subsequent license renewals to extend their operating life out to 80 years. Some with first extensions will choose to shut their plants down at or near the end of 60 years.
Given the new legislation signed into law recently and more submitted to Congress, more advanced reactor development and construction is quite likely in the United States.
I intentionally did not include Yucca Mountain in this article as there is longstanding precedent for long term on site storage of high level radioactive waste while waiting for the long delayed federal solution for permanent safe storage. I personally don’t see disposal of irradiated fuel as an obstacle for new plants or continued operation of existing plants.
In The Year 2525 by Zager & Evans
Western Union Mailgram
July 1 – The formal investiture of the United Kingdom’s Prince Charles as the Prince of Wales took place at Caernarvon Castle in Wale.Love Theme from “Romeo and Juliet” by Henry Mancini
If I hadn’t been paying attention to the road, I could have been in a head-on collision yesterday.
I
guess I wasn’t totally clear on what happened when I sent this text message to Karen shortly after it happened.
What I meant was “Stupid @#%$&@! van coming from the opposite direction moved into my lane – right in front of me – to make a left turn!”
I didn’t see who was driving the van. I don’t know if it was a man or a woman, old or young. All I know is that it was a big white van from a local concern and I would have hit it if I hadn’t come to a complete stop. It had moved into my lane to make a left turn like they thought it was a turning lane.
Below is a satellite image of the road where this near mishap occurred. The yellow arrow indicates my direction of travel to the east, the red that of the van to the west. Unlike a couple of the main roads, this one doesn’t have a center turning lane for most of its length through town, though there is one for a few blocks 2/3 of a mile to the east.
Most of the time, traffic in America is pretty safe. Road signs and markings are very standardized, and, except for speed limits, most people comply with roadway expectations.
Every now and again, though, someone has a mental hiccup and does something they wouldn’t normally do. For instance, several times over the years, I’ve stopped, looked both ways at an intersection, and almost proceeded while the traffic light was still red. In each of these instance, stop signs had been replaced with traffic signals, sometimes decades earlier.
An hour or so after yesterday’s near miss, just to the west on this same road, a compact car started to change lanes into the side of my truck. When I laid on my horn, the lady swerved quickly away.
Two close calls on the same day – and on the same road.
Image information: The image at the top of the page is an composite of two other images, intended for illustration only. The out-of-focus road is the same road where the described incident occurred.
In dream surveys, being in school often ranks in the top five categories subjects’ dreams, even among adults out of school for decades.
For one informal survey that included 128 people, respondents said they had dreams of high school (73%), college (34%), elementary school (12%), middle school (7%) (with a total of more than 100% if added because some had recurring dreams in more than one setting). 98.4% of respondents viewed their school dream experiences as somewhat unpleasant or very unpleasant, with some feeling their dreams went beyond anxiety to a panic level.1
There are all sorts of articles online about the meanings of dreams like these from psychological meanings to mystical meanings. Perhaps the dreams highlight unresolved childhood or young adult insecurities. Maybe there are lingering feelings of guilt, inferiority, or worries that misdeeds may be found out. Some dream superstitions say that to dream of teaching at school is a sign of good fortune while dreaming of being a student may foretell setbacks in business or work, especially if you dream of forgetting your lessons.2
The meaning of dreams has been puzzled over for centuries. Ancient Egyptians thought that dreams were either communications from the gods or prophecies of the future. Dream interpretation as a psychological field of study was scientifically established with Sigmund Freud’s The Interpretation of Dreams, which laid the foundation for many of his theories of the unconscious mind. Many experts now disagree with Freud’s conclusions and others believe that dreams don’t signify anything at all.3
Dreams are the stories our unconscious mind creates while we sleep. It’s thought that everyone dreams, though some people say they never remember having had any dreams. While dreams sometimes seem fantastical or illogical, they usually involve elements from waking life – involuntary clips, images, feelings, and memories that occur during the REM (rapid eye movement) period of sleep.4
My school dreams have occurred occasionally for years with variations usually on two specific themes:
Unlike school dreams for many, mine never has any anxiety or panic.
Both themes have foundations, I suppose, on aspects of my school years.
In 1965, we moved crosstown in North Platte, Nebraska, and I had to switch to a different junior high school. Then, going into high school two years later, I had to enroll in a much larger school in the middle of Houston, Texas. I only attended there one semester, moving to a smaller school just outside Houston. I really didn’t want to change schools, but my mom and step-dad promised that, after that move, I wouldn’t have to. We lived in 4 different rundown places between January 1968 and my graduation in May 1970, all of them in the same school district – and I didn’t have to change schools.
When I enrolled as a freshman at the University of Houston, I was driving a new-to-me used car that I had just purchased with my meager savings. Before classes even started, though, I totaled it on the way home from work when I hit a horse that was tied up on a too long rope that allowed it to go into the middle of the road.
I was able to make it to classes my first semester by catching a ride with another student from my area. Transportation home was by city bus and the closest stop was several miles from home. I was too introverted to try hitchhiking, so usually walked the entire distance. In the second semester, transportation was more difficult and, after a few weeks, I just stopped going. I didn’t understand I had to officially drop my classes and ended up on academic suspension.
Years later, I went back to school in part to finish what I had failed to complete. As a non-traditional student, I received an Associates Degree and a Bachelor of Science degree.
None of my school dreams are related to either of those
Don’t get me wrong, I’ve played poker — and several of its variations. I’m just not attracted to like many others are.
Poker remains popular for many, though far less so than than it was during the poker boom1 from 2003 through 2006. It’s not like it’s something new.
I was playing poker over four decades ago — and quit when it put my young family in financial difficulty.
It was in the 1970s — cold war period — and I was on a missile submarine in the North Atlantic. It was a three month patrol, 90 days without any way for the individual sailor to communicate with anyone not on the ship. We could receive five family grams during the patrol — 20 word limit each and censored to ensure there was nothing upsetting.
There wasn’t a lot of entertainment available to us for distraction. Video games, DVDs and VCRs weren’t around then. We had movies after the evening meal, but if you were on watch or asleep you didn’t get that. Most guys brought some books and there was a tiny library with a few more.
A lot of the time, for many, was filled with games, mostly card games like pinochle, spades, hearts, and cribbage. Some guys played backgammon. Then, too, there was the weekly poker game and — in the middle of patrol — casino night. I’m not sure what the legality of it was, but as an enlisted man, I’ve sat next to the ship’s commanding officer at a black-jack table while at 400 feet below the surface of the ocean — and, yes, we were gambling for money. A percentage went to the “welfare and rec. committee.” Funds from it, I suppose, were available to help guys and their families who might, at times, be struggling to make ends meet. The only benefit I saw personally from it was the ship’s party held each year one of the times when we were the crew off of the ship. (The missile subs had two crews — the blue crew and the gold crew. I was on the blue crew.) As I recall it, there was only one casino night each patrol, and I always came out ahead from it.
The weekly poker night, though, is what brought me down. It wasn’t high stakes, but over a period of several weeks, one could lose quite a bit of money. A percentage of the proceeds from it also went to the “welfare and rec.” fund. Since most of the guys didn’t have much money with them, the winnings and the losses were kept track of in a notebook. I never really did terribly bad, but I seldom came out a winner — and, for a time, I couldn’t stay away from the game. When what I owed got to somewhere over $200, I stopped. It wasn’t more than we would be able to handle. However, I still had to tell my wife that we were going to have to get by with less money for a while and that I had lost it by playing poker.
I never played poker, other than for fun, not cash, after that. I really enjoyed playing the game, by I also recognized in myself that it was something that I could enjoy too much, that I could easily get very engaged in it and lose a lot more than I lost on that submarine when there wasn’t a drop of alcohol to be had anywhere. I hate to think how much I would have lost if American ships allowed liquor on board.
Don’t get me wrong. I’m not against gambling. I’ve gambled on occasion, never cards, just slot machines and the lottery,2 but I don’t let my enjoyment of it overwhelm me, like I know it could. I keep in mind that I’m not going to win big and that I will likely take home less money than I came with, but I won’t lose more money than I planned.
Image information: Cassius Marcellus Coolidge – Poker Game (1894) (accessed June 22, 2019)