Sir Patrick Spens

(2 versions)
by Anonymous

Sir Patrick  Spens (Version 1)

The king sits in Dunfermling toune,
Drinking the blude-reid wine:
‘O whar will I get guid sailor,
To sail this schip of mine?’

Up and spak an eldern knicht,
Sat at the kings richt kne:
‘Sir Patrick Spens is the best sailor
That sails upon the se.’

The king has written a braid letter,
And signd it wi his hand,
And sent it to Sir Patrick Spens,
Was walking on the sand.

The first line that Sir Patrick red,
A loud lauch lauched he;
The next line that Sir Patrick red,
The teir blinded his ee.

‘O wha is this has don this deid,
This ill deid don to me,
To send me out this time o’ the yeir,
To sail upon the se! ‘

‘Mak haste, mak haste, my mirry men all,
Our guid schip sails the morne:’
‘O say na sae, my master deir,
For I feir a deadlie storme.

‘Late late yestereen I saw the new moone,
Wi the auld moone in hir arme,
And I feir, I feir, my deir master,
That we will cum to harme.’

O our Scots nobles wer richt laith
To weet their cork-heild schoone;
Bot lang owre a’ the play were playd,
Thair hats they swam aboone.

O lang, lang may their ladies sit,
Wi their fans into their hand,
Or eir they se Sir Patrick Spens
Cum sailing to the land.

O lang, lang may the ladies stand,
Wi thair gold kems in their hair,
Waiting for thair ain deir lords,
For they’ll se thame na mair.

Haf owre, haf owre to Aberdour,
It’s fiftie fadom deip,
And thair lies guid Sir Patrick Spens,
Wi the Scots lords at his feit.

Sir Patrick Spens  (Version 2)

I. The Sailing
THE king sits in Dunfermline town
Drinking the blude-red wine;
‘O whare will I get a skeely skipper
To sail this new ship o’ mine?’

O up and spak an eldern knight,
Sat at the king’s right knee;
‘Sir Patrick Spens is the best sailor
That ever sail’d the sea.’

Our king has written a braid letter,
And seal’d it with his hand,
And sent it to Sir Patrick Spens,
Was walking on the strand.

‘To Noroway, to Noroway,
To Noroway o’er the faem;
The king’s daughter o’ Noroway,
‘Tis thou must bring her hame.’

The first word that Sir Patrick read
So loud, loud laugh’d he;
The neist word that Sir Patrick read
The tear blinded his e’e.

‘O wha is this has done this deed
And tauld the king o’ me,
To send us out, at this time o’ year,
To sail upon the sea?

‘Be it wind, be it weet, be it hail, be it sleet,
Our ship must sail the faem;
The king’s daughter o’ Noroway,
‘Tis we must fetch her hame.’

They hoysed their sails on Monenday morn
Wi’ a’ the speed they may;
They hae landed in Noroway
Upon a Wodensday.


II. The Return

‘Mak ready, mak ready, my merry men a’!
Our gude ship sails the morn.’
‘Now ever alack, my master dear,
I fear a deadly storm.

‘I saw the new moon late yestreen
Wi’ the auld moon in her arm;
And if we gang to sea, master,
I fear we’ll come to harm.’

They hadna sail’d a league, a league,
A league but barely three,
When the lift grew dark, and the wind blew loud,
And gurly grew the sea.

The ankers brak, and the topmast lap,
It was sic a deadly storm:
And the waves cam owre the broken ship
Till a’ her sides were torn.

‘Go fetch a web o’ the silken claith,
Another o’ the twine,
And wap them into our ship’s side,
And let nae the sea come in.’

They fetch’d a web o’ the silken claith,
Another o’ the twine,
And they wapp’d them round that gude ship’s side,
But still the sea came in.

O laith, laith were our gude Scots lords
To wet their cork-heel’d shoon;
But lang or a’ the play was play’d
They wat their hats aboon.

And mony was the feather bed
That flatter’d on the faem;
And mony was the gude lord’s son
That never mair cam hame.

O lang, lang may the ladies sit,
Wi’ their fans into their hand,
Before they see Sir Patrick Spens
Come sailing to the strand!

And lang, lang may the maidens sit
Wi’ their gowd kames in their hair,
A-waiting for their ain dear loves!
For them they’ll see nae mair.

Half-owre, half-owre to Aberdour,
‘Tis fifty fathoms deep;
And there lies gude Sir Patrick Spens,
Wi’ the Scots lords at his feet!

0 comments
None

Ozymandias of Egypt

Percy Bysshe Shelley

I MET a traveller from an antique land
Who said:—Two vast and trunkless legs of stone
Stand in the desert. Near them on the sand,
Half sunk, a shatter’d visage lies, whose frown
And wrinkled lip and sneer of cold command
Tell that its sculptor well those passions read
Which yet survive, stamp’d on these lifeless things,
The hand that mock’d them and the heart that fed.
And on the pedestal these words appear:
“My name is Ozymandias, king of kings:
Look on my works, ye mighty, and despair!”
Nothing beside remains: round the decay
Of that colossal wreck, boundless and bare,
The lone and level sands stretch far away

0 comments
None

Historic Photographic Links at the Freehold

I’ve added several links to sites with historic photos at my link pages at the Freehold.

Historic Photography

  • Anderson, George Edward —Almost 13,000 images taken ca. 1878-1928, which includes studio and environmental portraits, mostly of Utah residents; Utah railroad and mining history (including the 1900 Scofield mine disaster); and Mormon (LDS) Church historic sites. (BYU)
    Camp, Walter Mason — 86 photographic images of the Indian Wars of North America, 1865-1890 (BYU)
  • Jackson, William Henry — Almost 1,100 images from one of the most renowned 19th century landscape photographers of the American West. The collection includes landscapes of the western United States and Mexico; but also 231 images of Asia and Pacific countries; 60 Native American portraits; and 30 pieces of art. (BYU)
  • Irvine, Edith — 293 photographs of California, especially stunning are her 1906 San Francisco earthquake images, with other important California images from the Electra Power Project (1898-1902), Mokelumne Hill and Yosemite National Park. (BYU)
  • Pictures of the Civil War — National Archives (NARA)
  • Regional Streetscape and Townscape Photographs of New York City, 1860-1942 — Several hundred prints and photographs offering the complete content of a wide range of selected image collections and illustrated monographs: Hudson River mansions, including Washington Irving’s home and vicinity in the 1860s; street views by Alice Austen from 1896; a panorama of Fifth Avenue from 1911, and more. (NYPL)
  • San Francisco Images — Fireman’s Fund
  • Savage, C. R. — Over 1,000 images from one of the foremost 19th century landscape photographers of the western United States. The collection includes portraits, many of prominent Mormon leaders; views of Utah and the west; mining operations; and some Native American portraits. (BYU)
  • Stewart, Willard — Photographs for the WPA and HABS, contains 246 photographs of landscapes and buildings in Delaware. The collection includes images from throughout Delaware, although the greatest number are from New Castle County, with the architecture of New Castle and Wilmington being extremely well represented. (University of Delaware)
  • Transportation Photographs — an ongoing digital collection of photographs depicting various modes of transportation in the Pacific Northwest region and Western United States during the first half of the 20th century. (University of Washington)

Post from one of my abandoned blogs – North Farnham Freeholder – recovered from Internet Archive WayBackMachine; March 2011


0 comments
None

Frustrated!!!

Sometimes the internet is just so frustrating!

This evening, I’ve been trying to find the manufacturer web sites for electrical generators. My intent is to add them to a page I’m making on the RV section of my Haw Creek Outdoors site as a reference for people looking for information.

Unfortunately, with the search words I’m using, most of the sites that are in the top 100 — or even more — of the search results are all to places that are selling — what else — generators. Some of the other sites are just pages of links that lead to other pages of links or pages of places wanting to sell — generators. And few of any of these pages provide information that would be useful in making a decision. Besides, my intent is not to link to sellers of RV equipment or pages of links. There’s plenty of that out there and I would just be creating more useless information.

The internet can be a very great and useful resource — and sometimes it can be oh-so-frustrating!


Post from one of my abandoned blogs – North Farnham Freeholder – recovered from Internet Archive WayBackMachine; March 2011


0 comments
None

Guestbook Spam???!!!

The spammers are getting more and more creative — (inventive, desperate?).

I just got a comment on a previous post, Comment Spam! — New Gambit (at least to me), where an individual has started getting comment spam on the guest book of a “personal site on at&t that nobody reads.” (see comment #11 on above link)

Anyone that looks at many of the posts on this site will see that I post a lot about various kinds of what I consider to be less-than-ethical activities on the internet. I’m going to continue doing that. I really, really dislike all of the hassle that these idiots are causing people who just want to use their computer, their e-mail, and their internet access.


Post from one of my abandoned blogs – North Farnham Freeholder – recovered from Internet Archive WayBackMachine; March 2011


0 comments
None

Worm Attack!!! Part Two

A co-worker was telling me today that he had bought a new computer after an unfortunate experience with his old computer, which was still using Windows 98. His story goes something like this:

Some time around the 17 or 18th of March, his son, who was on-line with the computer, hollered, “Hey Dad, look at this.” When he looked at the screen, there was some sort of error message that made him pick up the phone — they are still using dial-up — and shutdown the computer.

Over the phone line he heard electronic sounds, so he hung up, and picked it back up and hung up and picked it back up when the sounds were still there. After repeating this several times, an operator came on and asked if she could help him. He explained what had happened and what he had heard. She told him, “Sir, I show that you have an international call in progress, right now.” He told her that he needed her to terminate that call.

This coworker is not very computer savy — good enough at work to get his job done — and was ready to move up to a newer computer and operating system, so he’s not planning on trying to clean the old one of whatever malignant code was the problem. However, he did contact his financial institutions that he deals with on line and had them change his access information.

I don’t know if this has anything to do with the portscan worm that has been probing my computer since March 18 — its spoofed address is 7.12.12.16, an address that is supposed to be for internal US Department of Defense use — but this is one type of activity that an intruder could accomplish if he makes it through into your computer. (I originally posted about the port scan worm in a post on March 18, titled Worm Attack!!!.)


Post from one of my abandoned blogs – North Farnham Freeholder – recovered from Internet Archive WayBackMachine; March 2011


0 comments
None

Prank News Wire Article — Spam Wire? — Spire?

This is probably old news to some, but a 15 year old in New Jersey managed to get an online press release aggregator to publish a fake press release that the kid had written about being hired by Google. Ironically, Google News ended up linking to the fake article. According to a March 20th article by CNet, Google News has cut it’s ties with the I-Newswire.com.

The press release read:

“(I-Newswire) – 15 year old student, Tom Vendetta has been hired by search engine giant Google Inc. The student will receive a lowered salary, which will be placed into a bank account for future education, said Google CEO Larry Page. When asked what role Vendetta will play at the Tech Giant’s offices, Page said he wouldnt have a role at the Main Offices. Instead he would work from his home in the New Jersey suburbs. Vendetta will be incharge of working with recent security flaw’s in Google’s beta e-mail service, “Gmail”. Google said they first found out about him when they discovered the student’s blog, at http://tomvendetta.be. The media giant said they looked forward to working with Vendetta’s expertise in JavaScript and AJAX.

More on this can be read at:


Post from one of my abandoned blogs – North Farnham Freeholder – recovered from Internet Archive WayBackMachine, March 2011


0 comments
None

Worm Attack!!!

The last several days I’ve been getting quite a few notices from my Norton SystemWorks about attempts to access my computer by “worms.” The most recent was earlier this afternoon:

Details: Attempted Intrusion “Portscan” against your machine was detected and blocked.
Intruder: 7.12.12.16(13364).
Risk Level: Medium.
Protocol: UDP.
Attacked IP: PDDOC-G5G26QUAN(207.119.206.249).
Attacked Port: 1034.
Click the address to trace the attacker.

Details: Intrusion detected and blocked. All communication with 7.12.12.16 will be blocked for 30 minutes.

The notices were somewhat lacking in information about the worms and I’m not very knowledgeable about computer worms, so I decided to google it using the words portscan and worm.

It turns out, as I now understand it, that there are a number of different software “ports” for computers used for various kinds of communication. For instance, one “port” might be used for outgoing e-mail and others are used for incoming e-mail, instant messaging, etc.

A portscan worm is a probe coming in from the internet that scans these ports looking for opportunities to enter a vulnerable computer and do its dirty work.

I can’t think of anything good about this, except that SystemWorks appears to be successful in stopping it — for now.

26 Responses to “Worm Attack!!!”

  1. Richard UK Says:
    March 21st, 2006 at 5:14 pm I have had numerous attacks during the last two weeks made by the
    same person from the IP address mentioned. He/she is based in your
    country, (I’m in UK.)
    details obtained are;
    Colombus,
    Ohio,
    Org name: DoD Network Centre,
    Org ID: DNIC,
    3990 E. Broad Street,
    PostalCode 43218.
    My Norton software denies the criminal any access, unfortunately I
    cannot find an email address for the above organisation to report
    the scum’s activity. Perhaps someone reading your site can report
    the IP address etc to the organisation reporting the activity?
  2. Robin Says:
    March 22nd, 2006 at 11:49 am I’ve been getting the same message myself and it’s knocking me off the internet. I’m interested in hearing what the fix to this is.
  3. Mike Says:
    March 22nd, 2006 at 12:23 pm I haven’t seen an re-occurance of this since the 18th. For me, the fix seems to be to make sure that my operating system software, internet access software and Norton SystemWorks are up to date.Doing a search on the internet DNIC = Data Network Identification Code, so the Org ID is probably false.

    “DoD Network Centre” and “DoD Network Center” both came up with no match in Google. I suspect the Org name is also false. DoD normally refers to Department of Defense in the US.

    There is a “Defense Center Supply” at that address according to Google, but my bet would be that it has nothing to do with this worm.

    I don’t usually bother with reporting these things. I used to report every spam message and virus that I got. It got to be too much of a hassle. Then it occurred to me that if I’m getting these things, then people who get paid to look for them and react to them are also getting paid so I just do what I can to make my system secure and spread the word to others who might be interested. Now I get almost no viruses and way too much spam.

  4. Robin Says:
    March 22nd, 2006 at 1:26 pm Thanks I’ll run my update again just to make sure and if still having problem I’ll be contacting Norton.
  5. Sam Says:
    March 23rd, 2006 at 11:33 pm I’m getting the same thing, I was freaking out wondering why the Dept of Defense was trying to scope my pc. I’m glad to see some other with the same message.
  6. Peter Says:
    March 24th, 2006 at 9:39 am I’ve had a lot of trouble (in the UK) with this character as well, particularly when I am on Ebay. My Bullguard antivirus stops it each time, but there does not seem to be a full time cure. Whoever it it, he/she is very active, probing my system nearly every time I log on. Glad at least to see that i am not alone!
  7. Mike Says:
    March 24th, 2006 at 9:47 am That’s interesting. I don’t log off often. It does appear that the occurance corresponds to when I was logging back on after I had rebooted the machine for some reason.
  8. Paul Says:
    March 24th, 2006 at 11:32 am I’m getting the same thing in toronto. Every 6 hours 7.12.12.16 has been attacking my computer.
    I’ve traced it to DoD in Ohio who is collecting info for DISA in california. (Defense Information
    Systems Agency – www.disa.mil)Is this something to be concerned about?
  9. Kaia Says:
    March 24th, 2006 at 2:15 pm I’ve been getting this as well, just about every day for the past several days. Thanks for posting your info … it was freaking me out too.
  10. Mike Says:
    March 24th, 2006 at 7:05 pm While it “looks” like a Department of Defense hack, I doubt the accuracy of any of the info.So far as the need to be concerned about it, it appears that everyone that has commented here has software that that has seen it and, I suppose stopped it, with little or no adverse consequences. Robin, on the 22nd, mentioned getting knocked off the internet by it.

    From what I have been able to learn, it appears that an attack like this is a probe testing the vulerability of the computers being targeted. Once an vulnerable port is found, the hacker or hack software can insert code to do all sorts of things.

    I think that the ones that need to be concerned are those who do not have the protections in place to bar such attacks.

    The attack appears to have first popped up on the 18th, the day I originally made the post, then I didn’t see it for a while. I went back and looked at the worm detection activity, and it turns out it had popped up once on the 19th and again 1 time on the 20th. Then nothing until today at 3:40 am central time USA and then again 6 hours and 2 minutes later. Then 6 hours and 2 minutes later, it popped up again. It’s not getting in — just keeps trying. I’ll check tomorrow morning to see if it shows up at 3:46am or so.

  11. Jan-Dirk Says:
    March 25th, 2006 at 3:19 am I am experiencing same problems as described above, attacks occur every 6 hours and 3-4 minutes.
  12. Jay Says:
    March 25th, 2006 at 2:09 pm I too have been being scanned non stop from 7.12.12.16. This is indeed a Department of Defense ip, although it could be
    spoofed or something. I doubt this is actual intentional activity from the DoD. It is more likely that someone has managed to
    either spoof the ip or has actually managed to root a DoD computer for scanning purposes. Either way the DoD would probably
    not be happy to have this activity happening through one of its ips. They own from 7.0.0.0 – 7.255.255.255. One possible
    remedy would be to e-mail their abuse address, although I wasn’t able to find the specific abuse address this one did pop up
    HOSTMASTER@nic.mil as connected to the DoD whois results for 7.12.12.16. So perhaps someone out there who has made abuse
    complaints before and is familiar with the process could report this activity from 7.12.12.16 to HOSTMASTER@nic.mil
    and hopefully bring it to their attention so it can be stopped.
  13. Mike Says:
    March 25th, 2006 at 9:19 pm I didn’t have time to check this morning, but just
    now checked and it did show up three more times:3:50:12 am
    3:53:48 am
    3:57:15 am

    and nothing since…..

    Maybe he’s given up…..

    probably not…

  14. Jan (The Netherlands) Says:
    March 26th, 2006 at 10:37 am Until today march 26 (3 times), I got 28 attacks that Norton Internet Security succesfully blocked.
    First occurance march 15, 1 to 6 times a day.
  15. Stev(netherlands0 Says:
    March 26th, 2006 at 12:16 pm Yep me to here in holland.the ip 7.12.12.16 is port scanning my comp to for servrel days now.
    It seems that is now portscanning every 6 ours aprox..
    The best we can do is report it ate HOSTMASTER@nic.milSearch results for: 7.12.12.16

    OrgName: DoD Network Information Center
    OrgID: DNIC
    Address: 3990 E. Broad Street
    City: Columbus
    StateProv: OH
    PostalCode: 43218
    Country: US

    NetRange: 7.0.0.0 – 7.255.255.255
    CIDR: 7.0.0.0/8
    NetName: DISANET7
    NetHandle: NET-7-0-0-0-1
    Parent:
    NetType: Direct Allocation
    Comment: Defense Information Systems Agency
    Comment: DISA /D3
    Comment: 11440 Isaac Newton Square
    Comment: Reston, VA 22090-5087 US
    RegDate: 1997-11-24
    Updated: 1998-09-26

    RTechHandle: MIL-HSTMST-ARIN
    RTechName: Network DoD
    RTechPhone: +1-800-365-3642
    RTechEmail: HOSTMASTER@nic.mil

    OrgTechHandle: MIL-HSTMST-ARIN
    OrgTechName: Network DoD
    OrgTechPhone: +1-800-365-3642
    OrgTechEmail: HOSTMASTER@nic.mil

  16. Sunshine Says:
    March 27th, 2006 at 11:26 am After contacting the hostmaster at (800)365-3642 I was given the number to JTF-GNO (800)357-4231 who said that 7.12.12.16 is indeed being spoofed and anyone anving any problem with that ip should contact their own ISP and let them know. The lady I spoke with said that they can probably track this person down. 7.12.12.16 is indeed a DOD ip but that it’s for internal use only.
  17. North Farnham Freeholder » Blog Archive » Worm Attack!!! Part Two Says:
    March 28th, 2006 at 10:41 am […] I don’t know if this has anything to do with the portscan worm that has been probing my computer since March 18 — its spoofed address is 7.12.12.16, an address that is supposed to be for internal US Department of Defense use — but this is one type of activity that an intruder could accomplish if he makes it through into your computer. (I originally posted about the port scan worm in a post on March 18, titled Worm Attack!!!.) by Mike @ 10:41 am. Filed under internet, give me a break!, internet ethics, worms   [link] […]
  18. Mike Says:
    March 28th, 2006 at 10:44 am I’ve got a new post on this topic called Worm Attack!!! Part Two. I don’t know if this is the same fella, but if he suceedes in getting in through an open port, this is one kind of unethical activity that he could accomplish.
  19. Jack Says:
    March 29th, 2006 at 5:19 pm Just happened me here in Ireland.
  20. Robin Says:
    March 30th, 2006 at 9:23 am I’m still having problems with this as well. I’ve always had Norton Virus Protection , however, this last weekend I bought Norton System Works 2006 and the Norton Personal Firewall hoping that this would solve the problem. Not yet… Norton is stopping the attack AND kicking me off the internet for 30 mins at a time. Not good! Unfortunately in order for me to call Norton I must pay an addtional fee!! I’m wondering if my next step is to take my PC into the shop and have it gone over for a solution.
  21. Andrew Says:
    March 30th, 2006 at 6:46 pm Had this problem for over a week being intruded from 7.12.12.16(13364). Sent my logs to Symantec for analysis whether
    they can get DoD to plug their system or find a way to shut the turkey(s) down would be a reassuring thing. Another
    person in Toronto Canada has reported the same thing. Who knows may be the DoD is testing ISP providers worldwide to see who has
    any security holes to stip CyberTerroism? So far today no problems…I hate it when something seems to go away and then
    when you least expect it it comes back!Glad to hear I’m not the only sufferer!
  22. Moe Says:
    April 10th, 2006 at 9:59 am here is the message that I got pls if any one know how to resolve pls post it
  23. Moe Says:
    April 10th, 2006 at 10:01 am sorry if the pic does’nt open here is the direct link
    http://up5.w6w.net/upload/10-04-2006/w6w_200604101156091b4709f5.JPG
  24. Robin Says:
    April 10th, 2006 at 5:16 pm I’ve scheduled an appointment with the “Geek Squad” for this Friday, April 14th. I’ll let everyone know what the outcome is. I’m VERY frustrated by not being able to even get on the internet. Still kicks me off for 30 mins each time I try to log in.
  25. Dan Says:
    May 2nd, 2006 at 3:25 pm So what did the Geek Squad say?
  26. John Says:
    May 27th, 2006 at 9:28 am been getting hit from this (7.12.12.16) for a bit now.
    it stopped for a while , but started again on 21/5/06.
    latest port scan from it was on 26/5/06 .
    thing I noticed about it was the port scans only started when,
    I visited certain sites , be intrested to hear if anym

Post from one of my abandoned blogs – North Farnham Freeholder – recovered from Internet Archive WayBackMachine March 2011


1 comment
None

Blog now unblocked

In my last post, I described how my Chronicles of the American Civil War Digest blog on Blogger had been blocked due to having “characteristics of a spam blog. ”

Well, I followed their directions and the blog is now unblocked. So I guess it’s officially NOT a spam blog.

I very much appreciate that Blogger and others are addressing the problems associated with spamming on blogs. Temporarily blocking my blog was the right thing to do.

0 comments
None

One of my blogs is Locked!

On March 3, I started a blog on Blogger for use as a “digest” version of my Chronicles of the American Civil War blog. A sentence or two for each post of Chronicles is provided in the “digest,” with a link back to the full article.

Yesterday, when I went to post the material for March 15, I found the following:

WARNING

This blog has been locked by Blogger’s spam-prevention robots. You will not be able to publish your posts, but you will be able to save them as drafts.

Save your post as a draft or click here for more about what’s going on and how to get your blog unlocked.

When I clicked on the “click here” link, I found:

Blogger’s spam-prevention robots have detected that your blog has characteristics of a spam blog. (What’s a spam blog?) Since you’re an actual person reading this, your blog is probably not a spam blog. Automated spam detection is inherently fuzzy, and we sincerely apologize for this false positive.

You won’t be able to publish posts to your blog until one of our humans reviews it and verifies that it is not a spam blog. Please fill out the form below to get a review. We’ll take a look at your blog and unlock it in less than a business day.

If we don’t hear from you, though, we will remove your blog from Blog*Spot within 10 days.

Find out more about how Blogger is fighting spam blogs.

(current blogger spam blog link – 3/3/2011)


Post from one of my abandoned blogs – North Farnham Freeholder – recovered from Internet Archive WayBackMachine March 2011


1 comment
None