Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia is not a criminal. He has no convictions in the United States or anywhere else. He is a father, a husband, a union sheet metal apprentice, and a man whom an immigration judge once found to be credible, truthful, and in real danger if returned to his native El Salvador. And yet—despite a court order protecting him from removal—he now sits in a notorious Salvadoran prison known for its brutal conditions, after an unauthorized deportation carried out under the Trump administration in March 2025.
Abrego Garcia’s case is not a matter of policy disagreement. It is a matter of lawbreaking by the federal government. The U.S. government has already admitted in multiple filings that his removal was illegal. On April 7, the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously ordered the administration to “facilitate” his return. But the administration has stalled—offering no evidence that it has complied, and continuing to characterize him as a “verified” member of MS-13 based on unverified, second-hand police allegations made by a now-suspended detective.
A Family Targeted by Violence
Abrego Garcia fled El Salvador at 16 after years of extortion and threats by Barrio 18, one of the country’s most violent gangs. The gang targeted his mother’s food business and tried to recruit his older brother. After his brother fled to the U.S., Kilmar became the new target. The family moved multiple times and shuttered the business, but the threats continued until they finally sent him north in 2011.
Once in the U.S., Kilmar built a quiet life. He settled in Maryland, worked construction, married a U.S. citizen, and helped raise her two children—both with special needs. Their first child together was born in 2019, also with serious medical conditions. Kilmar supported his family while advancing his career, recently enrolling in an apprenticeship program and vocational training at the University of Maryland.
The Arrest and Deportation
On March 28, 2019, Abrego Garcia was arrested outside a Home Depot in Hyattsville, Maryland, where he was looking for work. He and three other men were detained. No criminal charges were filed. The only allegation came in the form of two documents—an ICE intake form and a local police “gang field interview sheet”—both generated hours after his arrest. The claim: that he was a “ranking” MS-13 member. The “evidence”: his hoodie, a Chicago Bulls hat, and an unnamed informant’s hearsay.
When taken before Immigration Judge Elizabeth Kessler for a bond hearing, ICE cited these forms. Despite objections from Kilmar’s attorney, who was denied the opportunity to cross-examine the police source, Kessler found the government’s claim “trustworthy.” The judge mentioned clothing as evidence and cited a “reliable source” without verification. She denied him bail.
Later, in a separate proceeding before Judge David M. Jones, Abrego Garcia was granted “withholding of removal”—a legal protection that recognizes a credible fear of persecution and blocks deportation to a dangerous home country. The judge specifically noted his honesty and the consistency of his testimony. The government did not appeal. Abrego Garcia was released and complied fully with annual immigration check-ins for five years.
That changed abruptly on March 12, 2025.
While driving his disabled 5-year-old son, Abrego Garcia was pulled over by ICE without a warrant. Agents took him into custody and notified his wife to pick up their child. Three days later, Kilmar was on a plane to El Salvador, delivered into the hands of the very government his immigration judge had ruled he must not be returned to. He now sits in CECOT—El Salvador’s high-security “terrorist confinement center”—a facility described by U.S. courts as presenting a high risk of intentional life-threatening harm.
The Government’s Excuse
The administration continues to claim that Abrego Garcia is a gang member, relying solely on a years-old ICE form and the contested gang field interview sheet—created by a now-suspended detective. No criminal charges. No trial. No cross-examination. No corroborating evidence. Even the alleged gang “clique” he was accused of belonging to operates in Long Island, New York—a state Abrego Garcia has never even visited.
His lawyer found no incident report tied to his arrest. The Hyattsville police didn’t include his name in their report. Attempts to contact the Gang Unit detective went nowhere; the officer had been suspended, and the department declined to comment.
Despite these facts, the Trump administration has so far ignored the Supreme Court’s directive to facilitate Kilmar’s return and report what steps are being taken.
Pam Bondi’s Defiant Stance
Attorney General Pam Bondi has been at the forefront of the administration’s refusal to comply with court orders. In an April 14 Oval Office meeting with President Bukele, Bondi stated, “If they want to return him, we would facilitate it, meaning provide a plane. That’s up for El Salvador if they want to return him. That’s not up to us.”
On April 16, she further asserted that Abrego Garcia is “not coming back to our country… There was no situation ever where he was going to stay in this country.”
Bondi has also defended the deportation by citing a 2021 restraining order filed by Abrego Garcia’s wife, alleging domestic violence. She claimed, “America is safer because he is gone. Maryland is safer because he is gone. That woman that he is married to and that child he had with her, they are safer tonight because he is out of our country and sitting in El Salvador where he belongs.”
These statements have drawn criticism from legal experts and human rights advocates, who argue that the administration is using unverified allegations to justify defying court orders and denying due process.
A Case That Demands Resolution
This is not a political debate—it is a constitutional and human rights issue. The government violated a standing court order, stripped a man of his liberty, and sent him to face the very threats he was legally protected from.
Now, the U.S. Supreme Court has spoken. The question is: will the government listen?
Pam Bondi’s defiant statements may play well in political echo chambers, but they cannot erase the legal facts: Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia was granted protection from removal under binding U.S. law. Deporting him was not a policy decision—it was a violation. The Supreme Court has ordered his return. The Department of Justice, Homeland Security, and Bondi herself are now on notice.
It’s not just Garcia’s future on the line—it’s the credibility of the American legal system.
Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia deserves due process. He deserves justice. And his family deserves answers.
#JusticeForKilmar #RuleOfLaw #ImmigrationRights #CECOT #Exit78 #PamBondiDefiesSCOTUS
