Sharing photos, videos, vintage images I've discovered, and -- occasionally -- commentary and thoughts from retired life and travels.

copyright

I now have 23 boards, 480 pins, and 26 likes on Pinterest – and there are no copyright issues on any of the items that I’ve pinned.

By far, most of the images are mine to begin with.  The rest are public domain, from websites that encourage – or, at least, allow – pinning, or are used under the “fair use” provision of copyright law.

Most of my Pinterest pins are images from my Haw Creek website and blog, which provides most of our internet income, even though I spend little time on it for posts, updates or maintenance.

I doubt that we will get much of a traffic boost pinning from my own pages almost exclusively.

Where I hope to see the boost is from the repins. I figured it would be worth a try.

I still have concerns about copyright issues associated with Pinterest.  For now, at least, I’m going to shy away from pinning too far away from the nest.

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

Update 3/24/2012 — I’m reconsidering my concern over Pinterest. Pinterest has come out with revised terms and is working on making private pinboards available.

I’ve developed a Pinterest Policy page.  Most pages here will be open for pinning, though the front page, archives, and selected pages will have it blocked.

A Pinterest pinboard, to me, is an online, published compilation of images that someone has collected.   It’s sort of like a published scrapbook.  If ya publish it, ya need to have the rights to publish the individual items in the scrapbook (compilation).

_______

I don’t like it.

It’s a great concept – organize and share all the beautiful things you find on the web.

There’s just two big sticky problems.

Copyright

The first is called copyright infringement.

Pinterest is primarily based around collecting pictures.  In collecting images and “pinning” them on their pinboards, the Pinterest user is publishing copies of other peoples’ work.

Copyright of a photograph or drawing starts as soon as an image is fixed in some sort of permanent form.  For electronic images, that occurs as soon as an image is saved as a file.

Making copies of this file, including publishing it somewhere other than where it is intended, violates the exclusive right of the creator of the image to make and/or approve copies.  The right to copy is why it’s called copyright.  If you didn’t create it and didn’t get permission, then you don’t have a right to copy, you don’t have a right to pin.

Terms of Use

The other big problem is the Pinterest terms of use.

Under the terms of  use, if you use Pinterest, then you  “represent and warrant that: (i) you either are the sole and exclusive owner of all Member Content that you make available through the Site, Application and Services or you have all rights, licenses, consents and releases that are necessary to grant to Cold Brew Labs the rights in such Member Content.”

The terms of use also says none of your Pinterest activities “will infringe, misappropriate or violate a third party’s patent, copyright, trademark, trade secret, moral rights or other proprietary or intellectual property rights, or rights of publicity or privacy, or result in the violation of any applicable law or regulation.”

In other words, by the terms of use that everyone agrees to before they can use Pinterest, every user is saying they have the right or permission to use every single thing that they are putting on their pinboard.

Somehow I rather doubt that many users really understand or that they even actually read the terms of use, let alone this part.

Wikipedia has an interesting statement concerning Pinterest and the issue of copyright.

Pinterest has a notification system which allows copyright holders to request that content be removed from the site. The Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) safe harbor status of Pinterest has been questioned given that it actively promotes its users to copy to Pinterest, for their perpetual use, any image on the internet. Pinterest users cannot claim safe harbor status and as such are exposed to possible legal action for pinning copyrighted material. (emphasis mine – MpG)

While it’s an interesting concept, given the present state of the internet and current copyright laws and treaties, the design of Pinterest by its very nature fosters unintended abuse of the intellectual property rights of others.

I’ve spent too much time researching and learning about copyright.  I ‘m going to have to take a pass on Pinterest.

Copy Right, Copy Sense

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

Copyright Myth

November 7, 2007

I just read the following disclaimer on a website that had screenplays for a fair number of movies:

DISCLAIMER:
All material published here was copied off the net, and therefore the curators are not liable to any copyright infringements or anything like that. Virtually all can be just links to somewhere off the internet.

It doesn’t matter where the material is obtained from. If you publish copyrighted material, it’s infringement unless you have permission from the copyright owner or it’s published under the fair use provisions of copyright law.

The idea that “I found it on the internet so it must be OK to use since someone else already put it there” is just plain wrong. It’s a myth that publishing something on the internet changes the copyright rules. All the internet does is make it easier to break the rules.

One of the exclusive rights of authors — or whoever else owns the copyright — is to distribute copies to the public… by whatever means. Publishing copyrighted material on line is an infringement of this exclusive right.

More copyright related information is available at Copy Right, Copy Sense.

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

A lost Exit78 post, recovered from Internet Archive WayBackMachine; March 2011

by Mike Goad

Article originally published 7/29/2003

This article is available for free distribution and reprint as a public service from the author. Please read conditions at the end of the article.

Since genealogical research inevitably involves copying of information, questions involving copyright often crop up. When an answer is given, it may be less than satisfactory. Sometimes the answer is wrong, sometimes there is little or no explanation, and sometimes the answer isn’t an answer, but a policy statement. In other instances, the answer is right, but it isn’t what the questioner wanted to hear.

While copyright can be very complex and confusing, the parts of copyright law that usually apply to genealogy are really pretty basic. There are a few fundamentals that can help deal with just about any genealogy copyright situation.

Copyright means copy right

Literally, the term copyright means the right to make copies of some product. By law, the right belongs to its creator. In copyright law, the product that’s copyrighted is referred to as a “work” and the creator of the work is its author. From that, we can say:

Making a copy of a work or a portion of a work is its author’s copy right.

In the U.S., the right to make a copy of a protected work is a constitutional, exclusive right of the work’s author, except that some limited copying is allowed by provisions of the copyright law. (see fair use)

Is it copyrighted?

If it’s created today by the original expression of the author and it can be viewed or copied, then it is protected under copyright. The law says:

    Copyright protection subsists… in original works of authorship fixed in any tangible medium of expression, now known or later developed, from which they can be perceived, reproduced, or otherwise communicated, either directly or with the aid of a machine or device.

(continued at Copy Right, Copy Sense)

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

A change in my RSS feeds

August 25, 2007

If you’re reading this blog by feeds, you will probably notice a change. I’ve changed from “full feed” to “summary.”

I just want to make it a little more difficult for content scrapers to get my full content. I’m going to stop giving it away. If they want to steal my content, some of them will have to come to the blog to get it.

I’m not so vain that I think I have a lot of people scraping my content…, yet. However, I do want to grow my blog and I don’t want my content diluted by having it duplicated elsewhere on the internet.

I made this decision after reading Darren Rowse’s The Age Old Debate – Excerpts of Full Posts in RSS Feeds.

I hate it when people steal my content or the content of others.  It’s copyright infringement and plagiarism.

4 Responses to “ A change in my RSS feeds ”
  1. 1 Steve Harrelson Says:
    August 25th, 2007 at 11:39 am Nice blog. I’m considering doing the same to mine to keep my traffic number up. It took me a few minutes to decide whether you were in Russellville or Arkadelphia, since Exit 78 on I-30 is just six miles from Lake DeGray. I knew those mountains in your pic were a little more steep and rugged than the ones in Clark County, though.

    Steve

  2. 2 Rose Says:
    August 26th, 2007 at 12:02 am Mike wise move. I have mine set on short too.
  3. 3 Jonathan Bailey Says:
    August 26th, 2007 at 10:20 pm One point to consider though. Even though this may thwart most RSS scrapers out there right now, the next generation of scrapers will likely have the ability to scrape from the site itself, much like what Technorati does for its search engines.

    The technology exists, it just hasn’t been applied yet to your traditional RSS scraper. It’s only a matter of time though.

    Just something to weigh, this might not be a long-term solution.

  4. Mike Goad Says:
    August 26th, 2007 at 10:50 pm Steve – that’s correct; it is the Exit78 on I40, Thanks for stopping by the blog

    Rose – thanks; time may tell if it’s smart or not

    Jonathan – thanks for commenting. It’s unfortunate that we have to even consider “long-term” solutions for unethical use of the internet.


A lost Exit78 post, recovered from Internet Archive WayBackMachine; March 2011


{ Comments on this entry are closed }

Copyright and blog scraping

August 10, 2007

On his blog, Shaun Low asks, “Do bloggers need a copyright page?.”

From a simple copyright perspective, the answer is no. As soon as any work is fixed in some tangible medium, the original expression in that work is protected by copyright law. As I am writing, I just saved what I had written before this sentence, so everything before this sentence is protected. When I post the article, everything in it will be covered by copyright.

Unfortunately, copyright infringement is so pervasive on the internet, it’s usually going to be difficult to do anything about it.

Content scrapers, though, usually indiscriminately scrape — steal — every bit of content from a post. Therefore, if one includes a copyright statement on every post — like you see at the end of this post — and that material appears elsewhere, it’s going to be a bit more obvious that it is stolen.

The copyright notice is another tweak to the blog. Thanks Shaun for a good question and post that made me think. Shaun’s blog is the newest addition to my growing blogroll of quality blogs.

August 11, 2007

dcr @ 12:49 am

It is difficult to do much about copyright infringement online, but every bit helps. TechFreak had another idea for fighting the scrapers in this post. The post also has links to other sites with various ideas on fighting content theft. I haven’t tried any of them yet. I’ve only used Google, as mentioned in a previous comment, and also Copyscape.

I use the Copyscrape graphic on some of my websites too, just to serve as an extra warning in addition to the copyright notice at the bottom of the page.

I should put the notice on my blog too…

Opal Tribble @ 6:38 am

I put the warning on my page and it’s on my RSS feed also. I constantly check to see if my information has been scraped. There are many people that really don’t think of it as stealing so a simple email does the trick but the ones that are difficult I’ll follow up with Google Spam. I haven’t had to go past that level yet.

August 12, 2007

dcr Blogs » Blog Archive » Are You Free? @ 3:23 pm

[…] you have to spend your time fighting content theft, how free are […]

August 20, 2007

The Spotlight Is On…. @ 4:06 pm

[…] writes many post that keep me coming back for more I thought I would point out two of his posts Copyright and Blog Scraping and Combating Internet […]

 


A lost Exit78 post , recovered from Internet Archive WayBackMachine; March 2011


{ Comments on this entry are closed }