Yes, but no.
Napoleon is believed by many to have been a shorty. Perhaps so by today’s standards, but he was above average height for the period in which he lived.
During the Napoleonic wars, the British Tory press depicted Napoleon as shorter than average. This perception took hold and persists to this day. Napoleon complex is a supposed inferiority complex where short people compensate for lack of height with over-aggressive behavior. The clichéd image of Napoleon in popular culture is of a comically short petty tyrant.
The misunderstanding over Napoleon’s height arose over the differences between the English and French systems of measurement. The French Revolutionary government established the first legal basis for the metric system in 1795. Implementation was poorly managed and the system was widely unpopular.
By imperial decree, in 1812, Napoleon instituted a revised system. Under it, the pied (foot) was 1/3 metre, with 12 pouce (inches) in each pied.
While the French system of metre, pied and pounce were similar in concept to the English Imperial yard, foot and inch, the French units were actually 9.3% larger.
Under the 1812 French units, if Napoleon was about 5 pied (feet), 2 pouce (inches) in height, he would be just under 5 feet, 8 inches by the English system. The average height of European men at the time was about 5 feet, 3 inches.
Perception misconception.
{ Comments on this entry are closed }
(not me!) and early 70s, settled down in the 
80s, splurged in the 
90s, and lost our financial butts 
in the 2000s (not me 
).
I don’t know about that. I think it’s just rationalization for some people, to make them feel better when they get 
grew closer and closer, I just more and more started thinking of my age as 60 instead of 59. After all, since last summer sometime, I’ve actually been closer to 60 than 59. 
Click for Exit78 Pinterest policy.
Pinterest–I tried it and …
March 21, 2012
Update 3/24/2012 — I’m reconsidering my concern over Pinterest. Pinterest has come out with revised terms and is working on making private pinboards available.
I’ve developed a Pinterest Policy page. Most pages here will be open for pinning, though the front page, archives, and selected pages will have it blocked.
A Pinterest pinboard, to me, is an online, published compilation of images that someone has collected. It’s sort of like a published scrapbook. If ya publish it, ya need to have the rights to publish the individual items in the scrapbook (compilation).
_______
I don’t like it.It’s a great concept – organize and share all the beautiful things you find on the web.
There’s just two big sticky problems.
Copyright
The first is called copyright infringement.
Pinterest is primarily based around collecting pictures. In collecting images and “pinning” them on their pinboards, the Pinterest user is publishing copies of other peoples’ work.
Copyright of a photograph or drawing starts as soon as an image is fixed in some sort of permanent form. For electronic images, that occurs as soon as an image is saved as a file.
Making copies of this file, including publishing it somewhere other than where it is intended, violates the exclusive right of the creator of the image to make and/or approve copies. The right to copy is why it’s called copyright. If you didn’t create it and didn’t get permission, then you don’t have a right to copy, you don’t have a right to pin.
Terms of Use
The other big problem is the Pinterest terms of use.
Under the terms of use, if you use Pinterest, then you “represent and warrant that: (i) you either are the sole and exclusive owner of all Member Content that you make available through the Site, Application and Services or you have all rights, licenses, consents and releases that are necessary to grant to Cold Brew Labs the rights in such Member Content.”
The terms of use also says none of your Pinterest activities “will infringe, misappropriate or violate a third party’s patent, copyright, trademark, trade secret, moral rights or other proprietary or intellectual property rights, or rights of publicity or privacy, or result in the violation of any applicable law or regulation.”
In other words, by the terms of use that everyone agrees to before they can use Pinterest, every user is saying they have the right or permission to use every single thing that they are putting on their pinboard.
Somehow I rather doubt that many users really understand or that they even actually read the terms of use, let alone this part.
Wikipedia has an interesting statement concerning Pinterest and the issue of copyright.
While it’s an interesting concept, given the present state of the internet and current copyright laws and treaties, the design of Pinterest by its very nature fosters unintended abuse of the intellectual property rights of others.
I’ve spent too much time researching and learning about copyright. I ‘m going to have to take a pass on Pinterest.
Copy Right, Copy Sense
{ Comments on this entry are closed }