Sharing photos, videos, vintage images I've discovered, and -- occasionally -- commentary and thoughts from retired life and travels.

December 2009

The only program that I’ve found so far that I wasn’t able to install on Windows 7 was my OmniPage 14 OCR program.

For those who don’t know the term, OCR stands for optical character recognition – in other words, a program that recognizes text in a scanned image and turns it into editable text.

For Christmas, I received a copy of OmniPage 17.  I plan to use it in a long range project that involves old public domain books.

Like any other processing software, an OCR program will to some degree be limited by the quality of the data, or, in this case, images, that is provided as input.

For my first test of the program, I loaded a pdf file of a 440 page book published in 1913.  OmniPage 17 was able to load and process the entire book, unlike previous versions of OmniPage and other OCR software that I have used, though  I’m sure that, at the time, they had also been somewhat limited by the operating systems and computers.

During the processing, OmniPage 17 flags text that it is not “certain” of and provides the user with the opportunity to correct or ignore the text.  The percentage of flagged text is far lower than I expected.

After the book was processed by OmniPage, I saved it and proofed it in Microsoft Word.

The proofing was, by far, the hardest part of the process.  I read the entire book, with much more attention to detail than I would have if I had just been reading it for pleasure, in order to correct any errors that the OCR might have made as well as to italicize words that were in italics in the book.  Again, the number of corrections needed were far fewer than I expected.  I suspect that there were be very few corrections needed when converting modern documents from image to text.

What was the book that I converted, some might wonder?

It’s part of the long term project, so I don’t want to be too specific at this time other than to say that it was a diary of a lady who had been raised in privilege.

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

French carbon tax is illegal!

December 30, 2009

A carbon tax poised to take effect on January 1, 2010, in France has been declared  illegal.  France’s Constitutional Council says that the tax burden was distributed unfairly and that there were too many exempt polluters. 

image

Observers say the council’s ruling is a severe blow to both Sarkozy’s environmental plan and as France’s budget for 2010. The government now has to find a way to come up with about 4.1 billion euros in revenue that was expected to be generated the tax.

Read more in Deutsche Welle’s French carbon tax declared illegal.

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

In an opinion piece in the Wall Street Journal online, Kenneth P. Green, a resident scholar at the American Enterprise Institute (AEI), discusses why the United Nations should no longer be in the business of climate change.

image 

In the aftermath of the Copenhagen Climate conference, it is clear that the United Nations-driven process is a bust, and that any similar process requiring economic suicide and massive wealth transfers will go nowhere. It is long since time to drop this charade, take the question of climate change out of the hands of the U.N., and implement more reasonable policies.

Fostering the resilience of societies around the world in case climate disaster strikes would be a start. Central to this process is for governments to stop making things worse, as they do when they subsidize risk-taking.

read more at Get the U. N. Out of the Climate Business

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

The winds of Climategate continue to swirl.  The following email from October 2009 – before the leak –  discusses potentially serious allegations of scientific ‘fraud’ by the East Anglia Climatic Research Unit and the UK Met Office:

climategate 

From: Sonja A Boehmer-Christiansen <Sonja.B-C@xxxxxxxxx.xxx
Date: 2 October 2009 18:09:39 GMT+01:00
To: Stephanie Ferguson <stephanie.ferguson@xxxxxxxxx.xxx
Cc: "Peiser, Benny"
<B.J.Peiser@xxxxxxxxx.xxx, Patrick David Henderson
<pdhenderson18@xxxxxxxxx.xxx, Christopher Monckton <monckton@xxxxxxxxx.xxx

Subject: RE: Please take note of
potetially serious allegations of scientific ‘fraud’ by CRU and Met Office

Dear Stephanie

I expect that a great deal of UKCIP work is based on the data provided by CRU (as does the work of the IPCC and of course UK climate
policy). Some of this, very fundamentally, would now seem to be open to scientific challenge, and may even face future legal enquiries. It may be
in the interest of UKCIP to inform itself in good time and become a little more ‘uncertain’ about its policy advice.

Perhaps you can comment on the following and pass the allegations made on to the relevant people.

It is beyond my expertise to assess the claims made, but they would fit into my perception of the whole ‘man-made global warming’ cum energy policy debate. I know several of the people involved personally and have no reason to doubt their sincerity and honour as scientists, though I am also aware of their highly critical (of IPCC science) policy positions.

I could also let you have statements by Steve McIntyre and Ross McKitrick. Ross McKitrick
currently teaches at Westminister Business School and who is fully informed about the relevant issues. He recently addressed a meeting of about 50 people in London.

Best wishes

Sonja B-C

Dr.Sonja A.Boehmer-Christiansen
Reader Emeritus, Department of Geography
Hull University
Editor, Energy&Environment
Multi-Science (www.multi-science.co.uk)
HULL HU6 7RX
Phone:(xxxx)xxxx xxxxxx/xxxxxx
Fax: (xxxx)xxxx xxxxxx/xxxxxx

TWO copied pieces follow, both relate to CRU and UK climate policy:

Read the “copied pieces” and related communications at climategate.org.

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

Arizona State Parks to close?

December 23, 2009

Update – January 16, 2010: Arizona State Parks to Close 13 more parks by June

According to the Arizona State Parks Foundation, a special session of the State Legislature has cut funding for the state parks system to the point all parks will close. The cuts are part of a $205 million budget reduction to mitigate an estimated $1.5 billion budget deficit.

In an Urgent Call to Action, the foundation is asking for help.

image

URGENT CALL TO ACTION!
The Arizona State Legislature has acted on House Bill 2001. It eliminates the ability of our Arizona State Parks system to operate. All parks will ultimately close as a result of this action. If you or your children wish to ever visit such extraordinary places like Kartchner Caverns State Park, Tonto Natural Bridge State Park or Tubac Presidio State Historic Park, you must act today. It is our last hope.

Call, email or write (sample letter at right) Governor Jan Brewer and urge her to veto the parks cuts listed in the article below.

Phone: 602-542-4331 or 800-253-0883
Email via Governor’s Contact page at:
www.governor.state.az.us/Contact.asp
Mail: The Honorable Jan Brewer, Governor of Arizona,
1700 West Washington, Phoenix, Arizona 85007

Read more at the Arizona State Parks Foundation website.

This post is being simultaneously published on Exit78 and Haw Creek Out ‘n About

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

It appears that the head of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has significant conflicts of interests with ventures and connections associated with climate change. Dr. Rajendra Pachauri is accused of making a fortune through links with carbon trading companies.

image

Telegraph.co.uk, 20 December 2009

No one in the world exercised more influence on the events leading up to the Copenhagen conference on global warming than Dr Rajendra Pachauri, chairman of the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and mastermind of its latest report in 2007.

Although Dr Pachauri is often presented as a scientist (he was even once described by the BBC as “the world’s top climate scientist”), as a former railway engineer with a PhD in economics he has no qualifications in climate science at all.

What has also almost entirely escaped attention, however, is how Dr Pachauri has established an astonishing worldwide portfolio of business interests with bodies which have been investing billions of dollars in organisations dependent on the IPCC’s policy recommendations.

read more at Questions over business deals of UN climate change guru Dr Rajendra Pachauri

{ Comments on this entry are closed }